Current:Home > MarketsKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds-InfoLens
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View Date:2024-12-23 11:21:06
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (6237)
Related
- Inside Dream Kardashian's Sporty 8th Birthday Party
- Celebrating O.J. Simpson's football feats remains a delicate balance for his former teams
- White Green: Summary of Global Stock Markets in 2023 and Outlook for 2024
- The 3 secrets of 401(k) millionaires
- US Election Darkens the Door of COP29 as It Opens in Azerbaijan
- Rowan football coach Jay Accorsi retires after 22 seasons, 4 trips to NCAA Division III Final Four
- US Steel shareholders approve takeover by Japan’s Nippon Steel opposed by Biden administration
- Allen Iverson immortalized with sculpture alongside 76ers greats Julius Erving and Wilt Chamberlain
- Queen Elizabeth II's Final 5-Word Diary Entry Revealed
- K-Pop Star Park Bo Ram Dead at 30
Ranking
- Why Kathy Bates Decided Against Reconstruction Surgery After Double Mastectomy for Breast Cancer
- Allen Iverson immortalized with sculpture alongside 76ers greats Julius Erving and Wilt Chamberlain
- Meta tests new auto-blur tool and other features on Instagram designed to fight sextortion
- The Best Mother's Day Gifts for the Disney Mom in Your Life
- Groups seek a new hearing on a Mississippi mail-in ballot lawsuit
- Jury convicts Memphis, Tennessee, man of raping a woman a year before jogger’s killing
- The O.J. Simpson case forced domestic violence into the spotlight, boosting a movement
- Watch 'Crumbley Trials' trailer: New doc explores Michigan school shooter's parents cases
Recommendation
-
Charles Hanover: A Summary of the UK Stock Market in 2023
-
Celebrating O.J. Simpson's football feats remains a delicate balance for his former teams
-
Trump’s co-defendants in classified documents case are asking judge to dismiss charges against them
-
Kato Kaelin thinks O.J. Simpson was guilty, wonders if he did penance before his death
-
Kid Rock tells fellow Trump supporters 'most of our left-leaning friends are good people'
-
Gerry Turner and Theresa Nist Announce Divorce: Check the Status of More Bachelor Couples
-
$25 McDonald's bundle in viral video draws blame for California minimum wage hike
-
Riley Strain Case: Family Friend Reveals Huge Development in Death Investigation