Current:Home > StocksJudge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation-InfoLens
Judge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation
View Date:2024-12-23 14:15:29
A federal judge on Thursday struck down a Biden administration policy that aimed to ease a path to citizenship for some undocumented immigrants who are married to U.S. citizens.
The program, lauded as one of the biggest presidential actions to help immigrant families in years, allowed undocumented spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens to apply for a green card without first having to leave the country.
The temporary relief from deportation brought a brief sense of security to some 500,000 immigrants estimated to benefit from the program before Texas-based U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker put it on hold in August, days after applicants filed their paperwork.
Barker ruled Thursday that the Biden administration had overstepped its authority by implementing the program and had stretched the legal interpretation of relevant immigration law “past its breaking point.”
The short-lived Biden administration initiative known as “Keeping Families Together” would have been unlikely to remain in place after Donald Trump took office in January. But its early termination creates greater uncertainty for immigrant families as many are bracing for Trump’s return to the White House.
Trump’s election victory this week sets the stage for a swift crackdown on undocumented individuals after the Republican ran on promises of “mass deportation.” The president-elect energized his supporters on the campaign trail with a litany anti-immigrant statements, including that immigrants were “poisoning the blood” of the nation.
During his first term, Trump appointed Barker as a judge in Tyler, Texas, which lies in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a favored venue for advocates pushing conservative arguments.
Barker had placed the immigration initiative on hold after Texas and 15 other states, led by their Republican attorneys general, filed a legal challenge accusing the executive branch of bypassing Congress to help immigrant families for “blatant political purposes.”
Republicans argued the initiative created costs for their states and could draw more migrants to the U.S.
The policy would have applied to people who have been living continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, do not pose a security threat and have utilized the existing legal authority known as “parole in place” that offers deportation protections.
Those married to a citizen by June 17, the day before the program was announced, could pay a $580 application fee and fill out a lengthy application explaining why they deserve humanitarian parole. If approved, applicants would have three years to seek permanent residency and obtain work authorization.
It was not immediately clear Thursday whether anyone had received approval under the program, which only accepted applications for about a week before the federal judge placed it on hold.
Noncitizen spouses are already eligible for legal status but often have to apply from their home countries. The process typically includes a years-long wait outside of the U.S., which can separate family members with different immigration statuses.
veryGood! (62)
Related
- Republican Rep. Juan Ciscomani wins reelection to Arizona US House seat
- National I Love Horses Day celebrates the role of horses in American life
- This Amika Hair Mask is So Good My Brother Steals It from Me, & It's on Sale for 34% Off on Amazon
- Understanding 403(b) Plans for Builders Legacy Advance Investment Education Foundation
- New wildfires burn in US Northeast while bigger blazes rage out West
- Exploring the 403(b) Plan: Quantum Prosperity Consortium Investment Education Foundation Insights
- Organizers expect enough signatures to ask Nebraska voters to repeal private school funding law
- Neo-Nazi ‘Maniac Murder Cult’ leader plotted to hand out poisoned candy to Jewish kids in New York
- California voters reject measure that would have banned forced prison labor
- Caitlin Clark at the Brickyard: NASCAR driver Josh Berry to feature WNBA star on his car
Ranking
- 32 things we learned in NFL Week 10: Who will challenge for NFC throne?
- Bears finally come to terms with first-round picks, QB Caleb Williams and WR Rome Odunze
- Secure Your Future: Why Invest in an IRA with Quantum Prosperity Consortium Investment Education Foundation
- Jurickson Profar of San Diego Padres has taken road less traveled to first All-Star Game
- Kim Kardashian Says She's Raising Her and Kanye West's 4 Kids By Herself
- Builders Legacy Advance Investment Education Foundation: The value of IRA savings 2
- The stepped-up security around Trump is apparent, with agents walling him off from RNC crowds
- Savannah Chrisley Shares Heartache Moment After Getting Custody of Siblings Grayson and Chloe
Recommendation
-
As US Catholic bishops meet, Trump looms over their work on abortion and immigration
-
The billionaire who fueled JD Vance's rapid rise to the Trump VP spot — analysis
-
Biden aims to cut through voter disenchantment as he courts Latino voters at Las Vegas conference
-
Stein, other North Carolina Democrats have fundraising leads entering summer
-
Charles Hanover: A Summary of the UK Stock Market in 2023
-
Few residents opt out of $600 million class action settlement in East Palestine, Ohio, derailment
-
Plain old bad luck? New Jersey sports betting revenue fell 24% in June from a year ago
-
MLB All-Star Game: Rookie pitchers to start Midseason classic