Current:Home > MarketsArkansas groups not asking US Supreme Court to review ruling limiting scope of Voting Rights Act-InfoLens
Arkansas groups not asking US Supreme Court to review ruling limiting scope of Voting Rights Act
View Date:2024-12-23 14:30:33
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — Progressive groups in Arkansas have decided to not ask the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on a lower court’s ruling that private groups can’t sue under a key section of the federal Voting Rights Act.
The Arkansas Public Policy Panel and the Arkansas State Conference NAACP, which challenged Arkansas’ new state House districts under the law, did not file a petition by Friday’s deadline asking the high court to review the ruling by the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
John Williams, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas, said the decision to not seek review did not signal agreement with the court ruling that the groups believe is “radically wrong.” The ACLU represents the groups in the case.
Williams said they didn’t seek review because they believe there’s still a mechanism for private groups to sue under another section of federal civil rights law.
“Because that still exists, there was no need to bring this up before the Supreme Court,” Williams said Monday.
The groups’ decision avoids a fight before the high court over a ruling that civil rights groups say erodes the law aimed at prohibiting racial discrimination in voting. The groups have argued last year’s ruling upends decades of precedent and would remove a key tool for voters to stand up for their rights.
The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in January denied a request for the case to go before the full circuit court after a panel ruled 2-1 last year that only the U.S. attorney general can enforce Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act requires political maps to include districts where minority populations’ preferred candidates can win elections. Lawsuits have long been brought under the section to try to ensure that Black voters have adequate political representation in places with a long history of racism, including many Southern states.
The Arkansas lawsuit challenged the state House redistricting plan, which was approved in 2021 by the all-Republican state Board of Apportionment.
The 8th Circuit ruling applies only to federal courts covered by the district, which includes Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota.
Arkansas’ Republican attorney general, Tim Griffin, called the groups’ decision to not take the issue to the Supreme Court a “win for Arkansas.”
“(The 8th Circuit ruling) confirmed that decisions about how to enforce the Voting Rights Act should be made by elected officials, not special interest groups,” Griffin said in a statement.
veryGood! (8793)
Related
- Nevada trial set for ‘Dances with Wolves’ actor in newly-revived sex abuse case
- Drea de Matteo, Adriana La Cerva on 'The Sopranos,' launches OnlyFans account
- Six St. Louis inmates face charges stemming from abduction of jail guard
- Kim calls for North Korean military to be constantly ready to smash US-led invasion plot
- Why Amanda Seyfried Traded Living in Hollywood for Life on a Farm in Upstate New York
- Maine’s puffin colonies recovering in the face of climate change
- Retired US swimming champion's death in US Virgin Islands caused by fentanyl intoxication
- MLB power rankings: Dodgers, Mookie Betts approach Braves country in NL standings, MVP race
- Horoscopes Today, November 12, 2024
- Mark Meadows argues GA election call 'part of my role'; Idalia strengthens: 5 Things podcast
Ranking
- Fantasy football Week 11: Trade value chart and rest of season rankings
- The Ultimatum Franchise Status Check: Find Out Who's Still Together
- Simone Biles wins record 8th U.S. Gymnastics title
- Why Lindsay Arnold Says She Made the Right Decision Leaving Dancing With the Stars
- Kevin Costner says he hasn't watched John Dutton's fate on 'Yellowstone': 'Swear to God'
- Florida braces for 'extremely dangerous' storm as Hurricane Idalia closes in: Live updates
- Jessie James Decker Shares Pregnancy Reaction After Husband Eric's Vasectomy Didn't Happen
- Florida football team alters its travel plans with Tropical Storm Idalia approaching the state
Recommendation
-
NYC bans unusual practice of forcing tenants to pay real estate brokers hired by landlords
-
News outlet asks court to dismiss former Mississippi governor’s defamation lawsuit
-
Jessie James Decker Shares Pregnancy Reaction After Husband Eric's Vasectomy Didn't Happen
-
Neurosurgeon investigating patient’s mystery symptoms plucks a worm from woman’s brain in Australia
-
Lunchables get early dismissal: Kraft Heinz pulls the iconic snack from school lunches
-
Second man dies following weekend shooting in downtown Louisville
-
Michigan man linked to extremist group gets year in prison for gun crimes
-
Six St. Louis inmates face charges stemming from abduction of jail guard