Current:Home > BackTrump moves to dismiss federal election interference case-InfoLens
Trump moves to dismiss federal election interference case
View Date:2024-12-23 11:54:56
Former President Donald Trump made his first motion to dismiss his federal election interference case Thursday, citing what his lawyers claim is his "absolute immunity" from prosecution for actions taken while serving in the nation's highest office.
"Breaking 234 years of precedent, the incumbent administration has charged President Trump for acts that lie not just within the 'outer perimeter,' but at the heart of his official responsibilities as President," Trump's attorneys say in their filing. "In doing so, the prosecution does not, and cannot, argue that President Trump's efforts to ensure election integrity, and to advocate for the same, were outside the scope of his duties."
The filing is the first in a series of anticipated motions to dismiss the case against Trump brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith that charged him with four counts related to his alleged plot to overturn the 2020 election.
MORE: Special counsel raises more concerns over Trump's attacks on witnesses
Trump in August pleaded not guilty to charges of undertaking a "criminal scheme" to overturn the results of the 2020 election by enlisting a slate of so-called "fake electors," using the Justice Department to conduct "sham election crime investigations," trying to enlist the vice president to "alter the election results," and promoting false claims of a stolen election as the Jan. 6 riot raged -- all in an effort to subvert democracy and remain in power.
The former president has denied all wrongdoing and denounced the charges as "a persecution of a political opponent."
While Smith's indictment specifically alleged Trump clearly acted outside the scope of his office while engaging in an unlawful conspiracy to obstruct the peaceful transfer of power, Trump's attorneys on Thursday contended that Smith "falsely claims President Trump's motives were impure" and that he "knew" reports of fraud in the election were untrue.
"...[As] the Constitution, the Supreme Court, and hundreds of years of history and tradition all make clear, the President's motivations are not for the prosecution or this Court to decide," they argue. "Rather, where, as here, the President's actions are within the ambit of his office, he is absolutely immune from prosecution."
MORE: Trump opposes special counsel's request for gag order in Jan. 6 case
Trump's attorneys hinge at least part of their argument of Trump's immunity on his acquittal by the Senate following his impeachment in the wake of the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol.
"The Impeachment Clauses provide that the President may be charged by indictment only in cases where the President has been impeached and convicted by trial in the Senate," they say. "Here, President Trump was acquitted by the Senate for the same course of conduct... The Special Counsel cannot second-guess the judgment of the duly elected United States Senate."
And rather than take the position that the actions taken by Trump leading up to the Jan. 6 attack fell within the "outer perimeter" of his duties -- including his pressure campaign against state officials to overturn his election losses, his alleged efforts to recruit the Justice Department to falsely declare the election was rife with fraud, and his push for then-Vice President Mike Pence to reject electors -- they instead make the case that such acts fell at the "heart of his constitutional duties" to ensure the election was conducted with integrity.
Judge Tanya Chutkan will likely order a briefing schedule laying out deadlines for the government to issue its response to the motion to dismiss.
veryGood! (914)
Related
- Texas’ 90,000 DACA recipients can sign up for Affordable Care Act coverage — for now
- EA is cutting Russian teams from its FIFA and NHL games over the Ukraine invasion
- See Vanessa Bryant and Daughters Natalia, Bianka and Capri Honor Late Kobe Bryant at Handprint Unveiling
- EU law targets Big Tech over hate speech, disinformation
- Sister Wives’ Janelle Brown Alleges Ex Kody Made False Claims About Family’s Finances
- Driverless taxis are coming to the streets of San Francisco
- Elon Musk just became Twitter's largest shareholder
- Hairstylist Chris Appleton Confirms Romance With Lukas Gage
- Taylor Swift's Dad Scott Swift Photobombs Couples Pic With Travis Kelce
- Top mafia boss Pasquale Bonavota arrested by Italian police after 5 years on the run
Ranking
- Tony Hinchcliffe refuses to apologize after calling Puerto Rico 'garbage' at Trump rally
- 2023 Coachella & Stagecoach Packing Guide: 24 Problem-Solving Beauty Products You Need To Beat the Heat
- Freddie Mercury's costumes, handwritten lyrics and exquisite clutter up for auction
- Why Tyra Banks Is Leaving Dancing With the Stars After Hosting 3 Seasons
- Does the NFL have a special teams bias when hiring head coaches? History indicates it does
- Canada bans China's Huawei Technologies from 5G networks
- Coronation Chair renovated and ready for King Charles III after 700 years of service
- American climber dies on Mount Everest, expedition organizer says
Recommendation
-
US Open finalist Taylor Fritz talks League of Legends, why he hated tennis and how he copied Sampras
-
One Tree Hill’s Hilarie Burton Shares How Chad Michael Murray Defended Her After Alleged Assault
-
U.S. accuses notorious Mexican cartel of targeting Americans in timeshare fraud
-
Top mafia boss Pasquale Bonavota arrested by Italian police after 5 years on the run
-
Watch a rescuer’s cat-like reflexes pluck a kitten from mid-air after a scary fall
-
Former TikTok moderators sue over emotional toll of 'extremely disturbing' videos
-
Gulf drug cartel lieutenant nicknamed The Goat arrested near Texas border
-
U.S. to send nuclear submarines to dock in South Korea for first time since 1980s