Current:Home > MySupreme Court Halts Clean Power Plan, with Implications Far Beyond the U.S.-InfoLens
Supreme Court Halts Clean Power Plan, with Implications Far Beyond the U.S.
View Date:2024-12-23 14:33:04
The Supreme Court put on hold the linchpin of President Obama’s climate policy, barring the Environmental Protection Agency on Tuesday from carrying out the administration’s new Clean Power Plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from electric power plants.
It was a surprising decision of staggering proportions, with repercussions that go far beyond the U.S. electrical grid, threatening the credibility of the Paris Agreement on climate change reached by the world’s nations in December.
The Clean Power Plan, designed to reduce by nearly a third emissions from fossil fuel-burning electricity plants, is the central element of the pledge by the United States to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by at least 26 percent by 2025.
It was an unusual intervention by the Supreme Court, given that a powerful appeals court had just weeks ago turned down a request by dozens of states and their allies in the fossil fuel industries to impose a stay on the new federal regulation.
By blocking enforcement of the rule, the justices sent a signal that conservatives on the court may be inclined to limit the agency’s powers under the Clean Air Act. The Supreme Court found in its 2007 decision Massachusetts v. EPA that the statute allows controls on carbon dioxide emissions that cause global warming.
It would have taken years for the Clean Power Plan to take full effect, but the first step would have been for states to file implementation plans starting in September. Planning was well under way for that. About half the states had joined in appealing the rule, and some of them had declared that they would have refused to file state plans. Now, none of them will have to meet the rule’s deadlines, which the EPA will be powerless to enforce.
SCOTUSblog, an authoritative web site covering the Supreme Court, said that the order “will delay all parts of the plan, including all deadlines that would stretch on into 2030, until after the D.C. Circuit completes its review and the Supreme Court has finished, if the case does wind up there. There appears to be little chance for those two stages of review to be over by the time President Obama’s term ends next January 20.”
Josh Earnest, the White House spokesman, said “we remain confident that we will prevail on the merits.” He said the EPA would continue working with those states that want to move ahead with pollution controls under the rule.
“I am extremely disappointed by the Supreme Court’s decision,” said Attorney General Kamala Harris of California, one of 17 states that argued in favor of the rule in the appeals court. “The Court’s decision, and the special interests working to undermine this plan, threatens our environment, public health and economy.”
West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrissey, whose state is the lead plaintiff challenging the rule, said “we are thrilled” by the “great victory.”
But environmental advocacy groups said they were confident that the rule would eventually pass judicial muster, and that in the meantime the trend toward greener power would continue.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has scheduled arguments for June and is expected to rule by late summer or early fall. An appeal to the Supreme Court would most likely be decided next year, after President Obama is out of office.
“We are confident the courts will ultimately uphold the Clean Power Plan on its merits,” said David Doniger of the Natural Resources Defense Council. “The electricity sector has embarked on an unstoppable shift from its high-pollution, dirty-fueled past to a safer, cleaner-powered future, and the stay cannot reverse that trend.”
veryGood! (38)
Related
- 'Heretic' spoilers! Hugh Grant spills on his horror villain's fears and fate
- Dean McDermott Says He's Inflicted a Lot of Damage and Pain on Ex Tori Spelling
- Jimmy Kimmel Returning to Host Oscars 2024
- JFK's E.R. doctors share new assassination details
- Who is Rep. Matt Gaetz, the Florida congressman Donald Trump picked to serve as attorney general?
- School board, over opposition, approves more than $700,000 in severance to outgoing superintendent
- Trump’s lawyers want a mistrial in his New York civil fraud case. They claim the judge is biased
- Justin Timberlake's Red Carpet Reunion With *NSYNC Doubled as a Rare Date Night With Jessica Biel
- Jennifer Lopez Turns Wicked Premiere Into Family Outing With 16-Year-Old Emme
- The Crown's Jonathan Pryce Has a Priceless Story About Meeting Queen Elizabeth II
Ranking
- Queen Elizabeth II's Final 5-Word Diary Entry Revealed
- A car struck a barricade near the Israeli Embassy in Tokyo. Police reportedly arrested the driver
- Chase turns deadly in rural Georgia when fleeing suspect crashes into stopped car, killing woman
- Stock market today: Asian shares wobble and oil prices fall after Biden’s meeting with China’s Xi
- Jason Kelce Offers Up NSFW Explanation for Why Men Have Beards
- Where the Republican presidential candidates stand on abortion
- Long-haul carrier Emirates orders 15 Airbus A350 after engine dispute during Dubai Air Show
- MLB Cy Young Awards: Yankees' Gerrit Cole is unanimous, Padres lefty Blake Snell wins second
Recommendation
-
Police capture Tennessee murder suspect accused of faking his own death on scenic highway
-
Mississippi governor rejects revenue estimate, fearing it would erode support for income tax cut
-
Salman Rushdie gets first-ever Lifetime Disturbing the Peace Award after word was suppressed for his safety
-
Blaze at a coal mine company building in northern China kills 19 and injures dozens
-
Quincy Jones laid to rest at private family funeral in Los Angeles
-
A suspicious letter to the top elections agency in Kansas appears harmless, authorities say
-
Anonymous video chat service Omegle shuts down, founder cites 'unspeakably heinous crimes'
-
It’s not yet summer in Brazil, but a dangerous heat wave is sweeping the country