Current:Home > ScamsThe Kansas Supreme Court has ruled that voting is not a fundamental right. What’s next for voters?-InfoLens
The Kansas Supreme Court has ruled that voting is not a fundamental right. What’s next for voters?
View Date:2024-12-23 14:55:35
A split Kansas Supreme Court ruling last week issued in a lawsuit over a 2021 election law found that voting is not a fundamental right listed in the state Constitution’s Bill of Rights.
The finding drew sharp criticism from three dissenting justices on the high court. The Associated Press looks at what the ruling might mean for Kansas residents and future elections.
WHAT IS THE ISSUE?
The ruling itself is wide-reaching, combining different lawsuits at various stages of litigation that challenge three different segments of a 2021 election law passed by the Kansas Legislature. It was a lawsuit challenging a ballot signature verification measure in which a majority of the high court found there is no right to vote enshrined in the Kansas Constitution’s Bill of Rights.
The measure requires election officials to match the signatures on advance mail ballots to a person’s voter registration record. The high court reversed a lower court’s dismissal of that lawsuit and instructed the lower court to consider whether the measure violates the equal protection rights of voters. But four of the court’s seven justices rejected arguments that the measure violates voting rights under the state’s Bill of Rights.
WHAT’S THE BIG DEAL?
The decision was written by Justice Caleb Stegall, who is seen as the most conservative of the court’s seven justices, five of whom were appointed by Democratic governors.
Stegall dismissed the strongly-worded objections of the dissenting justices, saying there is not a “fundamental right to vote” in Section 2 of the Bill of Rights, as the groups had argued.
The dissenting justices said that ignores long-held precedent by the Kansas Supreme Court. Justice Eric Rosen said “it staggers my imagination” to conclude Kansas citizens have no fundamental right to vote and called the majority opinion a “betrayal of our constitutional duty to safeguard the foundational rights of Kansans.”
Justice Melissa Taylor Standridge called the decision troubling, with far-reaching implications, and that the ruling “defies history, law, and logic and is just plain wrong.”
“For over 60 years, this interpretation of section 2 has been our precedent,” she wrote. “Without even a hint that it’s doing so, the majority overturns this precedent today.”
WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE RULING?
A determination that voting is not a fundamental right could embolden state lawmakers to push for further restrictions on advance voting and mail-in ballots, said Jamie Shew, election officer for Douglas County — Kansas’ most populous county.
The constant changes in election law are also confusing not only to election officials, but to voters, Shew said.
“I’ve had two voters who came in this morning, and they’re like, ‘Well, I read the paper about signature verification. Is my signature going to get tossed out?’” he recalled. “They were really nervous about it.”
Election laws had been fairly constant since the passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act by Congress, Shew said. But that changed in 2013, when the U.S. Supreme Court tossed out a key provision of that act, he said.
“Since then the rules just keep changing,” Shew said. “And I think our job is making sure that voters not only don’t get confused, but also don’t get frustrated and just stop participating.”
HOW DID WE GET HERE?
The Republican-led Legislature passed a raft of election law changes in 2021 over Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly’s veto amid false claims by some in the GOP that the 2020 presidential election wasn’t valid. Since that election, there have been lawsuits over voting across the country, and partisan election law battles have continued in high-profile states like Georgia, Arizona and Wisconsin. Fights for election advantage are also being waged in smaller states like South Dakota and Nebraska.
WHAT’S NEXT?
Shew said he and other election officials will focus on meting out the state’s voting laws fairly and helping make sure the public understands them.
Justice Dan Biles said in his dissent that courts must insist that the signature verification requirement — if it survives the lawsuit against it — is handled reliably and uniformly across the state. That includes analyzing the procedures for how a mismatched signature is flagged, how a voter is notified of the mismatch and whether the voter is given a reasonable opportunity to cure the problem.
“The Kansas Constitution explicitly sets forth—and absolutely protects—a citizen’s right to vote as the foundation of our democratic republic,” Biles wrote, “so it is serious business when a government official in one of our 105 counties rejects an otherwise lawful ballot just by eyeballing the signature on the outside envelope.”
veryGood! (5439)
Related
- Bohannan requests a recount in Iowa’s close congressional race as GOP wins control of House
- 171 trillion plastic particles floating in oceans as pollution reaches unprecedented levels, scientists warn
- A Black, trans journey through TV and film
- Milan Kundera, who wrote 'The Unbearable Lightness of Being,' dies at 94
- Mississippi governor intent on income tax cut even if states receive less federal money
- Why TikTok's Controversial Bold Glamour Filter Is More Than Meets the Eye
- Gisele Bündchen Shares Her Advice for When Life Gets Challenging
- Transcript: Rep. Ro Khanna on Face the Nation, March 12, 2023
- Garth Brooks wants to move his sexual assault case to federal court. How that could help the singer.
- Haley Lu Richardson Jokes About Being “Honorary” Jonas Brothers Wife After Starring in Music Video
Ranking
- Homes of Chiefs’ quarterback Mahomes and tight end Kelce were broken into last month
- Weekly news quiz: From ugly dogs to SCOTUS and a shiny new game show host
- Garcelle Beauvais Has the Best Response to Lisa Rinna Saying RHOBH Will Be Boring Without Her
- Remembering Oscar-winning actor and British Parliament member Glenda Jackson
- Lions QB Jared Goff, despite 5 interceptions, dared to become cold-blooded
- Facing book bans and restrictions on lessons, teachers are scared and self-censoring
- King Charles III gives brother Edward a birthday present: His late father's Duke of Edinburgh title
- Lizzy Caplan and Joshua Jackson Steam Up the Place in First Fatal Attraction Teaser
Recommendation
-
Cruise ship rescues 4 from disabled catamaran hundreds of miles off Bermuda, officials say
-
Walmart Ups Their Designer Collab Game With New Spring Brandon Maxwell x Scoop Drop
-
We unpack the 2023 Emmy nominations
-
Why Hailey Bieber's Marriage to Justin Bieber Always Makes Her Feel Like One Less Lonely Girl
-
Will Aaron Rodgers retire? Jets QB tells reporters he plans to play in 2025
-
Opinion: Remembering Ukrainian poet Victoria Amelina
-
Jane Birkin, British actress, singer and French icon, dies at 76
-
Find Out Which Office Alum Has Joined the Mean Girls Movie Musical