Current:Home > BackBreyers to pay $8.85 million to settle 'natural vanilla' ice cream dispute-InfoLens
Breyers to pay $8.85 million to settle 'natural vanilla' ice cream dispute
View Date:2025-01-09 08:19:04
U.S. customers who have bought Breyers Natural Vanilla ice cream over the past eight years may be eligible for cash payment in a nearly $9 million settlement against the ice cream company.
The lawsuit applies to customers in the U.S. who bought the ice cream between April 21, 2016 and August 14, 2024, according to a news release from the Supreme Court of the State of New York in the Bronx.
An $8.85 million settlement has been reached in the class action lawsuit, which was filed against both Unilever United States, Inc., which owns Breyers, and Conopco, Inc., the New York-based advertiser Breyers works with, according to the lawsuit.
According to the court’s news release, the lawsuit alleges the ice cream was labeled "vanilla" as if its flavor came only from the vanilla plant when in reality, the product’s flavor contained non-vanilla plant flavors.
“The Defendants dispute all of these allegations and deny any wrongdoing,” the news release read. “The Court has not decided who is right.”
Still, Conopco, Inc. and Unilever United States, Inc. have agreed to create a settlement fund of $8,850,000.
How to get your cash settlement
According to the news release, customers may be eligible for a cash settlement if they bought Breyers Natural Vanilla ice cream in any size in the U.S. between April 21, 2016 and Aug. 14, 2024.
Cash settlements will be awarded to:
- Settlement class members who submit valid claim forms by Feb. 19, 2025.
- Valid claims with proof of purchase ($1 per product).
- Valid claims without proof or purchase ($1 per product with a maximum of eight products).
- Settlement class members who submit a valid claim for products with both proof of purchase and without proof of purchase (these customers will get combined cash payment benefits)
According to the companies, each household can only submit one single claim form.
The court has ruled that the companies must develop a new product formula that does not include vanilla derived from non-vanilla plant sources within 12 months of the settlement’s finalization, according to the news release.
Can I still sue the companies individually?
The court said in its news release that customers who want to exercise their right to sue have to “exclude” themselves from the settlement by completing an exclusion form found on the settlement website.
Customers can also mail or email a written request for exclusion by Oct. 31 to the claims administrator.
“If you choose to exclude yourself from the Settlement, you will not be bound by the Settlement or any judgment in this lawsuit,” the court said in its news release.
Customers can also object to the settlement by Oct. 31.
The court plans to hold a fairness hearing on Nov. 21 to determine whether or not the settlement is reasonable. The court will consider any objections.
Customers can attend the final approval hearing if they’d like but it’s not a requirement.
“Please do not call the Court or the Clerk of the Court for information about the Settlement,” the court wrote.
Forms can be found at www.vanillaicecreamsettlement.com/Home/Documents.
For more information, call 1-888-603-5137 and for a complete list of included products, visit www.VanillaIceCreamSettlement.com.
Saleen Martin is a reporter on USA TODAY's NOW team. She is from Norfolk, Virginia – the 757. Follow her on Twitter at@SaleenMartin or email her at[email protected].
veryGood! (2712)
Related
- Lunchables get early dismissal: Kraft Heinz pulls the iconic snack from school lunches
- How Kansas women’s disappearance on a drive to pick up kids led to 4 arrests in Oklahoma
- Draft report says Missouri’s House speaker stymied ethics investigation into his spending
- Wisconsin Republicans ignore governor’s call to spend $125M to combat so-called forever chemicals
- John Robinson, successful football coach at USC and with the LA Rams, has died at 89
- People with disabilities sue in Wisconsin over lack of electronic absentee ballots
- Yoto Mini Speakers for children recalled due to burn and fire hazards
- NPR suspends senior editor Uri Berliner after essay accusing outlet of liberal bias
- As the transition unfolds, Trump eyes one of his favorite targets: US intelligence
- Stay Comfy on Your Flight With These Travel Essentials
Ranking
- A $1 billion proposal is the latest plan to refurbish and save the iconic Houston Astrodome
- Plumbing problem at Glen Canyon Dam brings new threat to Colorado River system
- Dr. Martens dour US revenue outlook for the year sends stock of iconic bootmaker plunging
- Caitlin Clark will play right away and drive ticket sales. What about other WNBA draftees?
- In bizarro world, Tennessee plays better defense, and Georgia's Kirby Smart comes unglued
- Wait, what is a scooped bagel? Inside the LA vs. New York debate dividing foodies.
- Suspect arrested after allegedly killing a man at a northern New Mexico rest stop, stealing cars
- Kate Hudson Defends Her Brother Oliver Hudson Against Trolls
Recommendation
-
Michigan soldier’s daughter finally took a long look at his 250 WWII letters
-
A top Federal Reserve official opens door to keeping rates high for longer
-
Ukraine prime minister calls for more investment in war-torn country during Chicago stop of US visit
-
Indiana limits abortion data for privacy under near-total ban, but some GOP candidates push back
-
Michael Grimm, former House member convicted of tax fraud, is paralyzed in fall from horse
-
Man gets 37-year sentence for kidnapping FBI employee in South Dakota
-
Barbie craze extends to summer grilling with Heinz Classic Barbiecue Sauce
-
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Coast to Coast