Current:Home > StocksPlanned Parenthood Wisconsin resumes abortion procedures after new court ruling-InfoLens
Planned Parenthood Wisconsin resumes abortion procedures after new court ruling
View Date:2024-12-23 15:06:53
Wisconsin's largest provider of abortions announced Thursday it was resuming services after a judge signaled in July she did not believe the state's abortion law actually bans consensual procedures like those performed at Planned Parenthood.
The move comes after abortions have been unavailable in Wisconsin for more than a year after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortions in the U.S. for 50 years before it was struck down in 2022.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization put back into effect an 1849 law that was interpreted by Planned Parenthood and other providers as banning all abortions except in situations where the mother could die.
Proponents of abortion access sued to invalidate the 19th century-era abortion law that became the center of Wisconsin politics during the 2022 midterms and the spring state Supreme Court race. But a recent order by a Dane County judge in the lawsuit interpreted the law differently, ruling the law in question does not actually ban consensual abortions.
“With patients and community as our central priority and driving force, we are eager to resume abortion services and provide this essential care to people in our State,” Tanya Atkinson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, said in a statement. “With the recent confirmation from the Court that there is not an enforceable abortion ban in Wisconsin, our staff can now provide the full scope of sexual and reproductive health care to anyone in Wisconsin who needs it, no matter what.”
Abortions will resume in Madison, Milwaukee on Monday
Abortions will resume Monday at Planned Parenthood clinics in Milwaukee and Madison, Wisconsin, and eventually at the organization's clinic in Sheboygan.
Planned Parenthood will operate under the state's pre-Dobbs abortion laws, under which abortion is banned 20 weeks after "probable fertilization." Women are required to undergo an ultrasound before an abortion, along with a counseling appointment and a 24-hour waiting period. In the case of medication abortions, the doctor who administers the pills must be the same one the woman saw for her counseling appointment, and the pills cannot be taken remotely via telemedicine.
Michelle Velasquez, Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin director of legal advocacy and services, acknowledged that the most recent court order is not a final ruling, and it's possible things will change in the future.
"We’ll have to take things as they come, but we are confident in our analysis and we are ready to provide this essential care again, because there is really, in our view, not a reason to wait any longer," Velasquez said.
Democrats cheer, Wisconsin Right to Life laments 'devastating day'
Gracie Skogman, legislative director for Wisconsin Right to Life, said it was "a devastating day for women and preborn children in Wisconsin."
"Planned Parenthood does not value the life of preborn children or women facing unexpected pregnancies, and this is another example of them valuing profit over comprehensive and life-affirming care of women," Skogman said in a statement.
Democrats in the state Capitol cheered the decision but said they won't let up on efforts to restore and expand abortion access in Wisconsin.
State Sen. Kelda Roys, D-Madison, who has for years spearheaded efforts to repeal the 1849 law, said lawmakers need to "ensure our state constitution protects reproductive rights" and work to expand access to medication abortion.
Planned Parenthood's decision is a welcome one, Roys said, but "abortion access will never be safe as long as politicians and judges can suspend our rights."
"Our fight to restore the same reproductive rights and freedoms Wisconsinites had up until the day the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe must continue," Democratic Gov. Tony Evers said in a statement. "I will keep fighting like hell every day until Wisconsinites have the right to make their own healthcare decisions without interference from politicians who don’t know anything about their lives, their family, or their circumstances."
Lawsuit at center of abortion question could come before Supreme Court next month
The lawsuit remains active in Dane County Circuit Court. It could eventually make its way to the state Supreme Court, which as of last month has a 4-3 liberal majority.
On July 7, Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper denied a motion to dismiss the case, saying doctors deserve an answer to which abortion-related state law they should follow now that the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, putting back into effect laws in Wisconsin that were dormant.
The judge signaled she did not believe the law in question applies to abortions but to feticide.
"There is no such thing as an '1849 Abortion Ban' in Wisconsin. A physician who performs a consensual medical abortion commits a crime only 'after the fetus or unborn child reaches viability …'" she wrote, explicitly adding the law does not prohibit consensual medical abortions.
More:Wisconsin's 1849 abortion law goes before the courts next week. Here's what happens if it is overturned.
veryGood! (215)
Related
- Justice Department sues to block UnitedHealth Group’s $3.3 billion purchase of Amedisys
- New York governor to outline agenda ahead of crucial House elections
- Taliban-appointed prime minister meets with a top Pakistan politician in hopes of reducing tensions
- Jim Gaffigan on surviving the holidays reality TV-style
- What do nails have to say about your health? Experts answer your FAQs.
- A Communist candidate gets approval to run in the Russian presidential election
- Killers of the Flower Moon star Lily Gladstone speaks in Blackfeet during Golden Globe speech
- Worker killed in Long Island after being buried while working on septic system
- Rōki Sasaki is coming to MLB: Dodgers the favorite to sign Japanese ace for cheap?
- NFL mock draft 2024: J.J. McCarthy among four QBs to be first-round picks
Ranking
- Stocks soared on news of Trump's election. Bonds sank. Here's why.
- Stock market today: Asian shares advance following Wall Street rally led by technology stocks
- A US citizen has been arrested in Moscow on drug charges
- US fighter jets to fly over Bosnia in a sign of support to the country as Serbs call for secession
- DWTS' Sasha Farber Claps Back at Diss From Jenn Tran's Ex Devin Strader
- Bradley Cooper, Charles Melton and More Stars Who Brought Their Moms to the 2024 Golden Globes
- Jury selection to begin in trial of man who fatally shot Kaylin Gillis in his driveway
- 'Mind-boggling': Firefighter charged after responding to house fire in another county, reports say
Recommendation
-
Panel advises Illinois commemorate its role in helping slaves escape the South
-
Dave's Hot Chicken is releasing 3 new menu items that are cauliflower based, meatless
-
California Gov. Gavin Newsom sets date for special election to replace Rep. Kevin McCarthy
-
Trump to return to federal court as judges hear arguments on whether he is immune from prosecution
-
Mississippi expects only a small growth in state budget
-
Taliban-appointed prime minister meets with a top Pakistan politician in hopes of reducing tensions
-
Arizona Governor Vows to Update State’s Water Laws
-
Gillian Anderson wears dress with embroidered vaginas to Golden Globes: 'Brand appropriate'