Current:Home > Back$70,000 engagement ring must be returned after canceled wedding, Massachusetts high court rules-InfoLens
$70,000 engagement ring must be returned after canceled wedding, Massachusetts high court rules
View Date:2024-12-23 11:11:39
BOSTON (AP) — Who gets to keep an engagement ring if a romance turns sour and the wedding is called off?
That’s what the highest court in Massachusetts was asked to decide with a $70,000 ring at the center of the dispute.
The court ultimately ruled Friday that an engagement ring must be returned to the person who purchased it, ending a six-decade state rule that required judges to try to identify who was to blame for the end of the relationship.
The case involved Bruce Johnson and Caroline Settino, who started dating in the summer of 2016, according to court filings. Over the next year, they traveled together, visiting New York, Bar Harbor, Maine, the Virgin Islands and Italy. Johnson paid for the vacations and also gave Settino jewelry, clothing, shoes and handbags.
Eventually, Johnson bought a $70,000 diamond engagement ring and in August 2017 asked Settino’s father for permission to marry her. Two months later, he also bought two wedding bands for about $3,700.
Johnson said he felt like after that Settino became increasingly critical and unsupportive, including berating him and not accompanying him to treatments when he was diagnosed with prostate cancer, according to court filings.
At some point Johnson looked at Settino’s cell phone and discovered a message from her to a man he didn’t know.
“My Bruce is going to be in Connecticut for three days. I need some playtime,” the message read. He also found messages from the man, including a voicemail in which the man referred to Settino as “cupcake” and said they didn’t see enough of each other. Settino has said the man was just a friend.
Johnson ended the engagement. But ownership of the ring remained up in the air.
A trial judge initially concluded Settino was entitled to keep the engagement ring, reasoning that Johnson “mistakenly thought Settino was cheating on him and called off the engagement.” An appeals court found Johnson should get the ring.
In September, the case landed before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, which ultimately ruled that Johnson should keep the ring.
In their ruling the justices said the case raised the question of whether the issue of “who is at fault” should continue to govern the rights to engagement rings when the wedding doesn’t happen.
More than six decades ago, the court found that an engagement ring is generally understood to be a conditional gift and determined that the person who gives it can get it back after a failed engagement, but only if that person was “without fault.”
“We now join the modern trend adopted by the majority of jurisdictions that have considered the issue and retire the concept of fault in this context,” the justices wrote in Friday’s ruling. “Where, as here, the planned wedding does not ensue and the engagement is ended, the engagement ring must be returned to the donor regardless of fault.”
Johnson’s lawyer, Stephanie Taverna Siden, welcomed the ruling.
“We are very pleased with the court’s decision today. It is a well-reasoned, fair and just decision and moves Massachusetts law in the right direction,” Siden said.
A lawyer for Settino did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- Suspect arrested after deadly Tuskegee University homecoming shooting
- Hundreds gather to remember former fire chief fatally shot at Trump rally in Pennsylvania
- Rally shooter had photos of Trump, Biden and other US officials on his phone, AP sources say
- JD Vance accepts GOP nomination and highlights Biden's age and his youth
- Young Black and Latino men say they chose Trump because of the economy and jobs. Here’s how and why
- Donald Trump will accept Republican nomination again days after surviving an assassination attempt
- Lucas Turner: What is cryptocurrency
- Delay of Texas death row inmate’s execution has not been the norm for Supreme Court, experts say
- John Krasinski named People magazine’s 2024 Sexiest Man Alive
- 16 Life-Changing Products You Never Knew You Needed Until Now
Ranking
- 'I heard it and felt it': Chemical facility explosion leaves 11 hospitalized in Louisville
- Pro-war Russian athletes allowed to compete in Paris Olympic games despite ban, group says
- Claim to Fame Reveals Relatives of Two and a Half Men and Full House Stars
- Trump has given no official info about his medical care for days since an assassination attempt
- Wisconsin authorities believe kayaker staged his disappearance and fled to Europe
- Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez Didn’t Acknowledge Their Anniversary—Here’s What They Did Instead
- FACT FOCUS: Trump, in Republican convention video, alludes to false claim 2020 election was stolen
- There are 1 billion victims of data breaches so far this year. Are you one of them?
Recommendation
-
NASCAR Hall of Fame driver Bobby Allison dies at 86
-
California first state to get federal funds for hydrogen energy hub to help replace fossil fuels
-
Still empty a year later, Omaha’s new $27M juvenile jail might never open as planned
-
Is vaping better than smoking? Here's what experts say.
-
My Chemical Romance returns with ‘The Black Parade’ tour
-
Oregon authorities recover body of award-winning chef who drowned in river accident
-
Prime Day 2024 Last Chance Deal: Get 57% Off Yankee Candles While You Still Can
-
Maika Monroe’s secret to success in Hollywood is a healthy relationship to it