Current:Home > StocksSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case-InfoLens
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View Date:2024-12-23 15:08:53
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (44)
Related
- Bluesky has added 1 million users since the US election as people seek alternatives to X
- This dad wanted a stress-free Christmas tradition for his kids. So he invented one.
- A Pakistani court orders public trial for imprisoned ex-premier Khan on charge of revealing secrets
- Stock market today: Asian shares mixed ahead of US consumer confidence and price data
- 32-year-old Maryland woman dies after golf cart accident
- Numerous horses killed in Franktown, Colorado barn fire, 1 person hospitalized
- Sierra Leone’s leader says most behind the weekend attacks are arrested, but few details are given
- US tells Israel any ground campaign in southern Gaza must limit further civilian displacement
- Digital Finance Research Institute Introduce
- How much should you tip? How about nothing? Tipping culture is out of control.
Ranking
- Jason Kelce collaborates with Stevie Nicks for Christmas duet: Hear the song
- 'The Voice' contestant Tom Nitti leaves Season 24 for 'personal reasons,' will not return
- With suspension over, struggling Warriors badly need Draymond Green to stay on the court
- Israel and Hamas extend their truce, but it seems only a matter of time before the war resumes
- Kim Kardashian and Kourtney Kardashian Team Up for SKIMS Collab With Dolce & Gabbana After Feud
- Oakland baseball will not die! City announces expansion team in Pioneer Baseball League
- Greek officials angry and puzzled after UK’s Sunak scraps leaders’ meeting over Parthenon Marbles
- Jennifer Lopez announces 'This Is Me…Now' album release date, accompanying movie
Recommendation
-
Jimmy Kimmel, more late-night hosts 'shocked' by Trump Cabinet picks: 'Goblins and weirdos'
-
2 missiles fired from Yemen in the direction of U.S. ship, officials say
-
Panama’s Supreme Court declares 20-year contract for Canadian copper mine unconstitutional
-
Nikki Haley lands endorsement from Koch brothers-backed Americans for Prosperity PAC
-
Dogecoin soars after Trump's Elon Musk announcement: What to know about the cryptocurrency
-
Illinois man wins $25K a year for life from lottery ticket after clerk's lucky mistake
-
Vanderpump Rules' Tom Sandoval Weighs in on Ariana Madix's New Boyfriend Daniel Wai
-
Oshkosh and Dutch firms awarded a $342 million contract to produce equipment trailers for US Army