Current:Home > MyPennsylvania high court revives a case challenging Medicaid limits for abortions-InfoLens
Pennsylvania high court revives a case challenging Medicaid limits for abortions
View Date:2024-12-23 14:50:57
HARRISBURG, Pa. — Pennsylvania's Supreme Court said Monday that a lower court must hear a challenge to the constitutionality of a decades-old state law that limits the use of Medicaid dollars to cover the cost of abortions, a major victory for Planned Parenthood and the abortion clinic operators who sued.
The decision also elicited hope that the state Supreme Court may one day find a right to abortion in Pennsylvania's constitution after the U.S. Supreme Court ended nearly a half-century of federal abortion protections by overturning Roe v. Wade.
The 3-2 decision both overturns a lower court decision to dismiss the case on procedural grounds and puts aside a 1985 state Supreme Court decision that upheld a law banning the use of state Medicaid dollars for abortion, except in cases of rape, incest or to save the life of the mother.
Alexis McGill Johnson, Planned Parenthood Federation of America's president and CEO, called the decision a "landmark victory for reproductive freedom."
The high court's majority said Monday in a 219-page decision that prior court decisions did not fully consider the breadth of state constitutional protections against discrimination, beyond those provided by the federal constitution.
The lawsuit, brought in 2019 by Planned Parenthood and other operators of abortion clinics, said the 1982 law unconstitutionally discriminates against poor women.
"Today's ruling is the first step toward ending discriminatory access to care, and we remain committed to removing every barrier to abortion," Signe Espinoza, executive director of Planned Parenthood of Pennsylvania's policy arm, said in a statement.
The state House's Republican floor leader, Rep. Bryan Cutler, had opposed the lawsuit in court and on Monday accused the state Supreme Court of "seeking to overstep its authority and change well-settled law."
The new ruling does not necessarily find a constitutional right to an abortion in Pennsylvania, where abortion is legal under state law through 23 weeks of pregnancy.
Rather, it turns on the question of whether the state Medicaid law unconstitutionally singled out a procedure sought only by women and differentiated between women who carry to term and women who get an abortion.
Women who get an abortion receive no government funding for the reproductive care they seek, while women who carry to term receive full coverage, the majority opinion said. Seventeen other states cover abortion in their state Medicaid programs, the court said.
The lower Commonwealth Court had said in its 2022 decision that it was bound by the prior state Supreme Court decision in dismissing the lawsuit.
But the majority said the lower court must now reconsider the case under a more stringent constitutional standard.
That part of the majority opinion was written by Justice Christine Donohue and joined by Justices David Wecht and Dougherty. Dissenting were Chief Justice Debra Todd and Justice Sally Mundy, the lone Republican to take part in the decision.
Todd and Mundy disagreed that the high court had issued a flawed decision in 1985. In her dissent, Mundy wrote that the 1985 decision was "well-considered, restrained and appropriate," and preserved the balance of power between the judicial and legislative branches.
That balance will be upset, however, if the court prevents lawmakers from advancing a state interest — for instance, encouraging childbirth over abortion — by prioritizing how to spend public money, Mundy wrote.
Justices Kevin Brobson and Daniel McCaffery joined the bench after the case was argued and didn't participate in the decision.
In one part of the majority opinion, Donohue made it clear that she sees a state constitutional right to abortion in the existing structure of Pennsylvania's constitution.
"We conclude that the Pennsylvania Constitution secures the fundamental right to reproductive autonomy, which includes a right to decide whether to have an abortion or to carry a pregnancy to term," Donohue wrote.
Wecht joined that part of the opinion. However, the other three justices did not.
Dougherty said he agreed with Todd and Mundy that the case is not about the right to an abortion, but qualified it in his written opinion by saying "at least, not yet."
David S. Cohen, a constitutional law professor at Drexel University's law school who helped argue the case, acknowledged that a majority of the court didn't find a fundamental right to abortion in Pennsylvania.
But, Cohen said, the issue will come back to the court in the future "and we now have a great building block to accomplish that goal."
veryGood! (9)
Related
- How Ben Affleck Really Feels About His and Jennifer Lopez’s Movie Gigli Today
- Newspaper heiress Patty Hearst was kidnapped 50 years ago. Now she’s famous for her dogs
- Japanese embassy says Taylor Swift should comfortably make it in time for the Super Bowl
- Policy Experts Say the UN Climate Talks Need Reform, but Change Would be Difficult in the Current Political Landscape
- RHOBH's Kyle Richards Shares Reaction to BFF Teddi Mellencamp's Divorce
- Inferno set off by gas blast in Kenya's capital injures hundreds, kills several; It was like an earthquake
- How a small Texas city landed in the spotlight during the state-federal clash over border security
- 'Senior Swifties': Retirement center goes viral for 'Swag Surfin' to cheer on Chiefs
- Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson weighs in on report that he would 'pee in a bottle' on set
- Pennsylvania police shoot and kill a wanted man outside of a gas station, saying he pointed gun
Ranking
- Justice Department sues to block UnitedHealth Group’s $3.3 billion purchase of Amedisys
- Inter Miami cruises past Hong Kong XI 4-1 despite missing injured Messi
- Men's college basketball schedule today: The six biggest games Saturday
- Union reaches deal with 4 hotel-casinos, 3 others still poised to strike at start of Super Bowl week
- Review: 'Emilia Pérez' is the most wildly original film you'll see in 2024
- Hiring is booming. So why aren't more Americans feeling better?
- Coast Guard searching for sailor, 60, who has been missing for 2 weeks
- Travel-Friendly Water Bottles That Don't Spill, Leak or Get Moldy & Gross
Recommendation
-
A pair of Trump officials have defended family separation and ramped-up deportations
-
Jillian Michaels Details the No. 1 Diet Mistake People Make—Other Than Ozempic
-
Chicagoland mansion formerly owned by R. Kelly, Rudolph Isley, up for sale. See inside
-
Miley Cyrus Makes First Red Carpet Appearance in 10 Months at Grammys 2024
-
New Orleans marks with parade the 64th anniversary of 4 little girls integrating city schools
-
Taylor Swift Drops Reputation Easter Eggs With Must-See 2024 Grammys Look
-
Joni Mitchell wins 10th Grammy for her 'very joyous' live album, set to perform at awards
-
New cancer cases to increase 77% by 2050, WHO estimates