Current:Home > BackIRS has second thoughts about selfie requirement-InfoLens
IRS has second thoughts about selfie requirement
View Date:2024-12-23 14:08:34
The Internal Revenue Service is backing away from a proposed requirement that people submit selfies to access their information on the agency's website.
First of all, to be clear: The IRS was not requiring that every taxpayer filing a return submit a selfie. It was only to verify the identities of people seeking to set up an account with the IRS to see their past returns or get information about child tax credit payments.
Still, it's an overreach, says Emily Tucker, director of the Center on Privacy and Technology at Georgetown Law.
"The consequences of not agreeing to give up a photo of yourself, which is then stored in a corporate database, which is protected only by that corporation's own easily changeable privacy policies, is that you may not be able to comply with federal tax law under some circumstances," she told NPR.
The IRS says because of a lack of resources, it contracted out the identity verification to a Virginia-based company called ID.me. That is where taxpayers would have submitted their photos to, and that is where the photos would have been kept.
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, says one of the problems with outsourcing this information is whether it's kept safe. "What it does is create another kind of target for criminals. Obviously, data breaches are a big issue. And, you know, the more areas that sensitive information is, the more likely it [will] be the target of a data breach."
18 federal agencies use some sort of facial recognition technology
ID.me says it does not sell the personal information of its users. "We do not sell data. Period. We will never sell data," ID.me co-founder and CEO Blake Hall told NPR. "Our mission as a company, the reason we exist, the reason I founded this company, is to put people in charge of their own information and to get it out of the hands of data brokers and credit bureaus, many of which are owned by foreign corporations."
And the IRS is not alone in using the company; 10 other federal agencies do, as well as many states, according to the company's website. A Government Accountability Office report last summer found that overall, 18 federal agencies use some sort of facial recognition technology, including law enforcement to spot criminals and Customs and Border Protection to check the identities of people entering the United States.
And its widespread use is part of the problem for privacy advocates like Scott. "You no longer have control over identity," Scott says. "And when that infrastructure is in place, it just takes, you know, a few bad actors to really kind of muck things up."
Scott also notes that research has shown that "to varying degrees, some of these algorithms have a racial bias and do not work as well on people of color."
But Hall says that while early algorithms were biased, that's no longer the case.
"The question now is not whether they're accurate — they're unbelievably accurate. The question is how they're used," he says.
Not everyone thinks facial recognition technology is a bad idea. Ashley Johnson, a senior policy analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, which is partially funded by the tech industry, says as long as safeguards are in place, it can be a useful tool.
"I would say that it can definitely have a lot of great benefits for users and for the organizations that are using them," she says.
But she cautions that the government needs to step up its cybersecurity protections. "There have been many high-profile data breaches of various different government agencies in the past that have involved government employees' employment information being stolen, citizens' information being stolen," Johnson says. "And this is the real privacy concern, in my opinion, just based on the history that we've seen of this happening in the past."
In a statement on its website, ID.me says its face match is comparable to taking a selfie to unlock a smartphone. But the company admits it also uses a form of verification called "1:many" in which it compares the submitted picture with an array of other photos. It says it does this for government programs targeted by organized crime.
Some in Congress are pushing back on the IRS' use of facial recognition software
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden, D-Ore., tweeted that he is "very disturbed" by the IRS plan and that "no one should be forced to submit to facial recognition as a condition of accessing essential government services." In a letter to IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig, Wyden wrote that "it is simply unacceptable to force Americans to submit to scans using facial recognition technology as a condition of interacting with the government online, including to access essential government programs."
And one lawmaker, Rep. Bill Huizenga, R-Mich., has proposed legislation forbidding the IRS from using facial recognition software, calling it "a huge mistake" by the agency and raising questions about its constitutionality.
ID.me's Hall says, "You can't hate everything. You know, if you hate government benefits [fraud] and identity theft fraud, then you can't be against the selfie. If you hate wait times and long processing things and bad customer service, then you can't hate the gains brought by automation."
Still, the IRS says it will be "transitioning away" from using ID.me to verify its accounts in the coming weeks.
veryGood! (3153)
Related
- Two 'incredibly rare' sea serpents seen in Southern California waters months apart
- ICHCOIN Trading Center: Impact of BTC Spot ETF
- Developers want water policy changes in response to construction limits on metro Phoenix’s fringes
- As interest peaks in tongue-tie release surgery for babies, here's what to know about procedure
- Congress heard more testimony about UFOs: Here are the biggest revelations
- Beyoncé Makes Flawless Surprise Appearance at Renaissance Film Premiere in Brazil
- U.S. charges Hezbollah operative who allegedly planned 1994 Argentina bombing that killed 85
- Holiday togetherness can also mean family fights. But there are ways to try to sidestep the drama
- Can't afford a home? Why becoming a landlord might be the best way to 'house hack.'
- MLB is bringing more changes to baseball in 2024. Here's what you need to know.
Ranking
- Lions QB Jared Goff, despite 5 interceptions, dared to become cold-blooded
- Humans could have arrived in North America 10,000 years earlier, new research shows
- New Hampshire newspaper publisher fined $620 over political advertisement omissions
- Thomas Morse Jr. is named chief of police for the Baton Rouge Police Department.
- Teachers in 3 Massachusetts communities continue strike over pay, paid parental leave
- ICHCOIN Trading Center: Significance of Cryptocurrency Cross-Border Payments
- How did a man born 2,000 years ago in Russia end up dead in the U.K.? DNA solves the mystery.
- Stock market today: Asian shares are mixed after a rebound on Wall Street
Recommendation
-
Northern Taurid meteor shower hits peak activity this week: When and where to watch
-
German medical device maker plans $88 million expansion in suburban Atlanta, hiring more than 200
-
Arriving police unknowingly directed shooter out of building during frantic search for UNLV gunman
-
Chicago man exonerated in 2011 murder case where legally blind eyewitness gave testimony
-
Jennifer Garner and Boyfriend John Miller Are All Smiles In Rare Public Outing
-
Predicting next year's economic storylines
-
More Brazilians declared themselves as being biracial, country’s statistics agency says
-
New York bill could interfere with Chick-fil-A’s long-standing policy to close Sundays