Current:Home > BackJudge allows lawsuit that challenges Idaho’s broad abortion ban to move forward-InfoLens
Judge allows lawsuit that challenges Idaho’s broad abortion ban to move forward
View Date:2024-12-23 14:10:36
An Idaho judge on Friday denied a request by the state’s top legal chief to throw out a lawsuit seeking to clarify the exemptions tucked inside the state’s broad abortion ban.
Instead, 4th District Judge Jason Scott narrowed the case to focus only on the circumstances where an abortion would be allowed and whether abortion care in emergency situations applies to Idaho’s state constitutional right to enjoy and defend life and the right to secure safety.
Scott’s decision comes just two weeks after a hearing where Idaho’s Attorney General Raul Labrador’s office attempted to dismiss the case spearheaded by four women and several physicians, who filed the case earlier this year.
Similar lawsuits are playing out around the nation, with some of them, like Idaho’s, brought by the Center for Reproductive Rights on behalf of doctors and pregnant people who were denied access to abortions while facing serious pregnancy complications.
According to the Center for Reproductive Rights, Idaho’s Constitution entitles its residents to certain fundamental rights, but a sweeping abortion ban poses a risk to those rights.
Labrador’s office countered that the Idaho Supreme Court has already upheld the state’s abortion bans — thus solving any lingering questions on the matter.
Scott agreed in part with the state attorneys that the state Supreme Court ruled there was no fundamental right to abortion inside the state constitution, but added that the court didn’t reject “every conceivable as applied challenge that might be made in a future case.”
“We’re grateful the court saw through the state’s callous attempt to ignore the pain and suffering their laws are causing Idahoans,” said Gail Deady, a senior staff attorney for the Center for Reproductive Rights. “Now the state of Idaho will be forced to answer to these women in a court of law.”
Meanwhile, the Idaho judge also sided with the attorney general in removing Gov. Brad Little, Labrador, and the Idaho Board of Medicine as named defendants in the lawsuit — leaving the state of Idaho as the only remaining defendant. Scott called the long list of defendants as “redundant,” saying that all three would be subject to whatever is ultimately decided in the lawsuit.
“This is only the beginning of this litigation, but the Attorney General is encouraged by this ruling,” Labrador’s office said in a statement. “He has long held that the named defendants were simply inappropriate, and that our legislatively passed laws do not violate the Idaho Constitution by narrowly limiting abortions or interfering with a doctor’s right to practice medicine.”
The four women named in the case were all denied abortions in Idaho after learning they were pregnant with fetuses that were unlikely to go to term or survive birth, and that the pregnancies also put them at risk of serious medical complications. All four traveled to Oregon or Washington for the procedures.
Idaho has several abortion bans, but notably Idaho lawmakers approved a ban as a trigger law in March of 2020, before the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.
At the time, any suggestion that the ban could harm pregnant people was quickly brushed off by the bill’s sponsor, Republican Sen. Todd Lakey, who said during one debate that the health of the mother “weighs less, yes, than the life of the child.”
The trigger ban took effect in 2022. Since then, Idaho’s roster of obstetricians and other pregnancy-related specialists has been shrinking.
veryGood! (3)
Related
- 10 Trendy Bags To Bring to All of Your Holiday Plans
- Kalen DeBoer, Jalen Milroe save Alabama football season, as LSU's Brian Kelly goes splat
- Fire crews on both US coasts battle wildfires, 1 dead; Veterans Day ceremony postponed
- One person is dead after a shooting at Tuskegee University
- Hurricane forecasters on alert: November storm could head for Florida
- Trump is likely to name a loyalist as Pentagon chief after tumultuous first term
- Pete Rose fans say final goodbye at 14-hour visitation in Cincinnati
- Are banks, post offices, UPS and FedEx open on Veterans Day? Here's what to know
- Lions QB Jared Goff, despite 5 interceptions, dared to become cold-blooded
- Mega Millions winning numbers for November 8 drawing: Jackpot rises to $361 million
Ranking
- Mike Tyson vs. Jake Paul VIP fight package costs a whopping $2M. Here's who bought it.
- 2 Florida women charged after shooting death of photographer is livestreamed
- Firefighters make progress, but Southern California wildfire rages on
- Bradley Cooper and Gigi Hadid Enjoy a Broadway Date Night and All that Jazz
- Kennesaw State football coach Brian Bohannon steps down after 10 seasons amid first year in FBS
- Todd Golden to continue as Florida basketball coach despite sexual harassment probe
- 32 things we learned in NFL Week 10: Who will challenge for NFC throne?
- Dwayne Johnson Admits to Peeing in Bottles on Set After Behavior Controversy
Recommendation
-
Stop smartphone distractions by creating a focus mode: Video tutorial
-
Are banks, post offices, UPS and FedEx open on Veterans Day? Here's what to know
-
Early Black Friday Deals: 70% Off Apple, Dyson, Tarte, Barefoot Dreams, Le Creuset & More + Free Shipping
-
Northern Taurid meteor shower hits peak activity this week: When and where to watch
-
Lions find way to win, Bears in tough spot: Best (and worst) from NFL Week 10
-
Ben Affleck and His Son Samuel, 12, Enjoy a Rare Night Out Together
-
Beyoncé's Grammy nominations in country categories aren't the first to blur genre lines
-
'Climate change is real': New York parks employee killed as historic drought fuels blazes